Dan Smith - May 5th - Part One Dan Smith-May5-07-...
Dan Smith - May 5th - Part Two
Dan Smith-May5-07-...



UFO, ALIEN, DISCLOSURE, SERPO, SEINU, PROJECT-CAMELOT - Open Minds Forum - http://www.openmindsforum.com/
« UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jun 3, 2007, 11:50pm





UFO, ALIEN, DISCLOSURE, SERPO, SEINU, PROJECT-CAMELOT - Open Minds Forum - WWW.OpenMindsForum.com :: General :: UFO/ Alien / Exobiology :: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« »    [Search This Thread] [Send Topic To Friend] [Print]
 Author Topic: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed (Read 58,828 times)
MidusTouch
Junior Member
**
member is offline

[avatar]

[msn]

Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 19
Location: Macau
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1650 on Today at 6:27pm »

I would like you guys to think DEEP about the points below.

Re: Chad + friend in Central California sighting

“First of all, I see this thing VERY often. Since it first appeared, I have probably seen this thing maybe 8 different times since the first appearance. My friend and I went out the next day after I first saw it to get the photos, but it was not there. Then we tried again the next day, and we found it within like 30 minutes and followed it for a while. Most of the time I see it out of windows in my house, in the distance. but I would say almost half of the hikes I have gone on in my area, I have seen it very close. It is very easy to photograph and... many neighbors aside from my friend have also seen it.”

Period of sighting: from late April to early May

Chad claimed he saw the drone 8 times (could be less) b4 taking the 6 photos.

What he saw during the 8 different times may not be the same drone every time and the drone was flying (not hovering or lurking) slowing from a distance of his window. If it was hovering near one spot, Chad would not wait 8 times in many days b4 setting out to take photos, he would go after seeing it 1-2 times.

Chad + friend spent 30mins to find the drone in the 2nd day and it means the trail is an easy one. And then that drone was not moving anywhere it was waiting for them to take photos.

Chad + wife live in Central California and they’re most likely live near Santa Cruz mountains with a lake nearby like Lake Tahoe sighting and it’s not far from Capitola.

Q: Were these drones looking for a crashed vehicle near a lake or they were trying to send a message to Arnold meaning ‘I’ll be back’??
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

IP or not IP: that's the question
colorsymphony
Full Member
***
member is online

[avatar]



Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 76
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1651 on Today at 7:09pm »

hahahahaha! i hope it's "ill be back"!!! :D
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
ibrahim
Junior Member
**
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12
Location: Minsk
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1652 on Today at 8:15pm »


Today at 7:09pm, colorsymphony wrote:
hahahahaha! i hope it's "ill be back"!!! :D


I would'nt holding breath!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
ibrahim
Junior Member
**
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12
Location: Minsk
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1653 on Today at 8:18pm »


Today at 3:44pm, fore wrote:
For Raj maybe ;).

By the way the camera does seem to have a film mode. (amazing considering it's age)


I loving pretty woman!!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
garuda
Forum Peer-Group Member
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

Dare to know!



Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 378
Location: two trees away from tarzan
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1654 on Today at 8:31pm »

For what it's worth: while looking for existing technology that might explain the drones, I came across this article: US Military Ready to Use UFOs, Cylons To Come Next

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Nothing is more dangerous than an idea when it's the only one you have - Emile Chartier
ibrahim
Junior Member
**
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12
Location: Minsk
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1655 on Today at 8:34pm »


Today at 8:31pm, garuda wrote:
For what it's worth: while looking for existing technology that might explain the drones, I came across this article: US Military Ready to Use UFOs, Cylons To Come Next


Well little doughnut thing not very scary. Bush is scary.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
spf33
Senior Member
****
member is offline





Joined: May 2007
Posts: 107
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1656 on Today at 8:48pm »


Today at 8:31pm, garuda wrote:
For what it's worth: while looking for existing technology that might explain the drones, I came across this article: US Military Ready to Use UFOs, Cylons To Come Next



where would the propellers be on the chad\raj object?
what would explain the low frequency hum?
what about the asymmetry?

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
ibrahim
Junior Member
**
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12
Location: Minsk
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1657 on Today at 8:50pm »


Today at 8:48pm, spf33 wrote:

Today at 8:31pm, garuda wrote:
For what it's worth: while looking for existing technology that might explain the drones, I came across this article: US Military Ready to Use UFOs, Cylons To Come Next



where would the propellers be on the chad\raj object?
what would explain the low frequency hum?
what about the asymmetry?



Doghnuts with motors. I laugh at this. You are either crazy or insane!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Maro Farez
Full Member
***
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: May 2007
Posts: 35
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1658 on Today at 9:11pm »


Today at 8:50pm, ibrahim wrote:

Today at 8:48pm, spf33 wrote:


where would the propellers be on the chad\raj object?
what would explain the low frequency hum?
what about the asymmetry?



Doghnuts with motors. I laugh at this. You are either crazy or insane!



ibrahim,

How does your above statement contribute to the conversation in a productive way?
« Last Edit: Today at 9:14pm by Maro Farez » Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
ibrahim
Junior Member
**
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12
Location: Minsk
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1659 on Today at 9:18pm »


Today at 9:11pm, Maro Farez wrote:

Today at 8:50pm, ibrahim wrote:


Doghnuts with motors. I laugh at this. You are either crazy or insane!



ibrahim,

How does your above statement contribute to the conversation in a productive way?


Only as this. If you study nonsense your result will be nonsense. No? Please get real. Doughnuts are not important.

I will add. You are very silly people. Look at reality. If that hurts then look at Fore's girl. One or the other will satisfy you!
« Last Edit: Today at 9:23pm by ibrahim » Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Maro Farez
Full Member
***
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: May 2007
Posts: 35
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1660 on Today at 9:22pm »


Today at 9:18pm, ibrahim wrote:

Today at 9:11pm, Maro Farez wrote:



ibrahim,

How does your above statement contribute to the conversation in a productive way?


Only as this. If you study nonsense your result will be nonsense. No? Please get real. Doughnuts are not important.


Than say that, instead of name calling spf33 crazy or insane.

This so called doughnut may very well be relevant. If Geoff is able to build this so called doughnut in his basement and post directions on how to build your own; than imagine what else is out there.
« Last Edit: Today at 9:29pm by Maro Farez » Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
ibrahim
Junior Member
**
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12
Location: Minsk
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1661 on Today at 9:27pm »


Today at 9:22pm, Maro Farez wrote:

Today at 9:18pm, ibrahim wrote:


Only as this. If you study nonsense your result will be nonsense. No? Please get real. Doughnuts are not important.


Than say that, instead of name calling.

This so called doughnut may very well be relevant. If Geoff is able to build this so called doughnut in his basement and post directions on how to build your own; than imagine what else is out there.


Mario, I have never called names. Please do not say this.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
onthefence
Full Member
***
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 77
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1662 on Today at 9:35pm »


Today at 3:21pm, fore wrote:
Here is some detailed info on the camera that Raj allegedly used to photograph the ufo in capitola:
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2002_reviews/dimagex.html
Thanks for the link fore.
I'm not sure what people expect to find after getting the original memory stick that the images were saved on. According to the manual for the DiMAGE X:


Quote:
This camera has four image-quality settings: super fine, fine, standard, and economy. Always select the desired setting before taking the picture. Image quality is set in the basic section of the recording-mode menu (p. 28).
...
Super fine - the highest-quality image. = TIFF


It is very likely that the JPEG images submitted to Flikr were the sames ones on the card and that we'll never likely see any more detail (uncompressed TIFF) than the JPEGs.

If you think you can identify a hoax/real by physically checking the card -- images can be uploaded to cards as well as downloaded.

Also, for those wishing for video to prove real/hoax. Video on any camera will result in MUCH lower resolution, certainly nothing to read fonts with. And, video can also be forged -- so this can surely still not satisfy skeptics.
« Last Edit: Today at 9:38pm by onthefence » Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

"Only the puny secrets need protecting. Big discoveries are protected by public incredulity." Marshall McLuhan
ibrahim
Junior Member
**
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12
Location: Minsk
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1663 on Today at 9:41pm »

I have read spf posts. he is best poster here. i also say smokey, ivo, ipfree and theshadow. bad posters are fore, colorsyymp and the guy, dan the devil.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Dragonfire
UFO/EXOBIO MODERATOR
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

Deceptive Fence-sitter



Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,800
Location: Somewhere in time
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1664 on Today at 9:45pm »


Quote:
Also, for those wishing for video to prove real/hoax. Video on any camera will result in MUCH lower resolution, certainly nothing to read fonts with. And, video can also be forged -- so this can surely still not satisfy skeptics.


Nothing will satisfy a "true" skeptic, even if ET comes up and shakes their hand. The open minded skeptics that are associated with this forum are smarter than that ;D
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Irritating the world, one person at a time.
« »    [Search This Thread] [Send Topic To Friend] [Print]

The Alien Seeker News

Click to discover what is: - 'Exempt From Disclosure'


Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free



This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Board!