greatwaller Member
Of Honour Writer on Serpo & UFO Historian member is
offline
Joined: Feb 2006 Posts:
928
Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and
detailed « Reply #1773 on
Today at 8:01pm »
Hi
DF,
I agree with your comment.
Please
remember this Chinese proverb: "The physical feature of
a mountain or river can be altered but how hard to
change the temperament of human nature."
Though
Smokey aka Cartoonsyndicate is a maverick but yet he
most often speaks the
truth...
Joined: Feb 2007 Gender: Male
Posts: 218 Location: California
Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and
detailed « Reply #1775 on
Today at 8:04pm »
Ok
Jedd,
I'd be happy to oblige. You probably
already know that I lean heavily to the ET probe side.
Here's why I believe this not to be a hoax.
1)
The pictures look real to me. I have a very keen eye to
spot a fake. Sure CGI is done by hollywood costing
millions of dollars. In movies it looks quite real
because the visuals are moving and you cannot analyze
them properly. But usually even then I can spot cgi. But
if you take any of the 300 effects and give me a one
frame snap shot I can pick it apart in a heartbeat. The
Chad photos are as real as they come and so are the Raj
photos. That's why all the cg experts can nerver find
fault with them because they are real.
2) Reports
from multiple witnesses.
3) Object is like no
others. It's asymetric. A hoaxer would have simply had
pics of a standard flying saucer. You really think
hoaxers are that smart? Not even professional sci fi
writers can come up with something this real and
detailed.
So where's this hoax you speak of?
Seems if it is a hoax somebody has went through a lot of
trouble for what? To bring down UFOlogy? Well it didn't
work because UFOlogy doesn't seem to care any way.
I'd
be happy to oblige. You probably already know
that I lean heavily to the ET probe side. Here's
why I believe this not to be a hoax.
1)
The pictures look real to me. I have a very keen
eye to spot a fake. Sure CGI is done by
hollywood costing millions of dollars. In movies
it looks quite real because the visuals are
moving and you cannot analyze them properly. But
usually even then I can spot cgi. But if you
take any of the 300 effects and give me a one
frame snap shot I can pick it apart in a
heartbeat. The Chad photos are as real as they
come and so are the Raj photos. That's why all
the cg experts can nerver find fault with them
because they are real.
2) Reports from
multiple witnesses.
3) Object is like no
others. It's asymetric. A hoaxer would have
simply had pics of a standard flying saucer. You
really think hoaxers are that smart? Not even
professional sci fi writers can come up with
something this real and detailed.
So
where's this hoax you speak of? Seems if it is a
hoax somebody has went through a lot of trouble
for what? To bring down UFOlogy? Well it didn't
work because UFOlogy doesn't seem to care any
way.
Well
I'm no expert, but everywhere across the internet,
"experts" have stated the opposite. That these are CGI.
That is the general consensus.
Multiple
witnesses? I know of three and only Raj stepped up to
the plate. He didn't hit a homer. Not even a base hit
lol. The others simply submitted their pics while
remaining aonymous. Is Chad his real name? What is his
location? Can a team of investigators come out to survey
the sighting location? Not hardly.
The object is
like no other, I agree. But the standard flying disk is
so common that something eerily strange could spark a
fire on the internet. Hoaxers can be smart! John Titor
even included pics of his time machine.
The only
hoax I speak of is the one I feel this is. A hoax's
intent can be anything from dis-info to deflection
(notice how we all forgot about Dan Smith). Or simply a
case of "lets see how many will believe it!".
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts:
1,811 Location: Somewhere in time
Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and
detailed « Reply #1778 on
Today at 8:21pm »
On another
note, and I ask this way back in the single digit page's
I think, who's to say what an ET craft really looks
like. We have been programed for the "disc" shape. So,
this unusual shape is something new. At least for
us.
On another note, and
I ask this way back in the single digit page's I
think, who's to say what an ET craft really
looks like. We have been programed for the
"disc" shape. So, this unusual shape is
something new. At least for
us.
In
every photo I have looked at, the object appears to me
to be about 5-10 feet long. If it is a real object, It
wasn't designed for passengers.
On another note, and
I ask this way back in the single digit page's I
think, who's to say what an ET craft really
looks like. We have been programed for the
"disc" shape. So, this unusual shape is
something new. At least for
us.
In
every photo I have looked at, the object appears
to me to be about 5-10 feet long. If it is a
real object, It wasn't designed for passengers.
If
it was, very short small one's
But then, that IS what we perceive ET to be.
Well I'm no
expert, but everywhere across the internet,
"experts" have stated the opposite. That these
are CGI. That is the general
consensus.
None
have ever proven anything wrong with the photos. All I
ever heard is so called experts who had already made up
their minds saying foolish stuff like "it's an obvious
fake" without giving any evidence to back them
up.
Quote:
Multiple
witnesses? I know of three and only Raj stepped
up to the plate. He didn't hit a homer. Not even
a base hit lol. The others simply submitted
their pics while remaining aonymous. Is Chad his
real name? What is his location? Can a team of
investigators come out to survey the sighting
location? Not
hardly.
Maybe
your expectations of Raj were a little too high. I for
one am very happy with what he has brought so far. I'm
hoping he stays with us but with all the accusations of
hoax and the stupid name calling I wouldn't blame him if
he blew us off. Could it be the debunker want to scare
him off?
![[Search This Thread]](http://s2.images.proboards.com/search2.gif)
![[Add Bookmark]](http://s2.images.proboards.com/buttons/bookmark.gif)
![[Reply]](http://s2.images.proboards.com/buttons/reply.gif)
![[Send Topic To Friend]](http://s2.images.proboards.com/buttons/sendtopic.gif)
![[Print]](http://s2.images.proboards.com/buttons/print.gif)
Author
![[avatar]](http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n77/jjohnston1_2006/small-red-fire-dragon-1.gif)
![[email]](http://s2.images.proboards.com/buttons/email_sm.gif)
![[send pm]](http://s2.images.proboards.com/buttons/message_sm.gif)
Logged
![[avatar]](http://s2.images.proboards.com/avatars/devil.gif)
![[avatar]](http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j311/jeddyhi/golf_tips.gif)
My nerves are intact and all is well! ![[image]](http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j311/jeddyhi/OM2.jpg)
![[avatar]](http://i7.tinypic.com/210eqdd.jpg)
![[avatar]](http://mywebpages.comcast.net/dl1027/files/2.jpg)
