Dan Smith - May 5th - Part One Dan Smith-May5-07-...
Dan Smith - May 5th - Part Two
Dan Smith-May5-07-...



UFO, ALIEN, DISCLOSURE, SERPO, SEINU, PROJECT-CAMELOT - Open Minds Forum - http://www.openmindsforum.com/
UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jun 9, 2007, 3:50pm





UFO, ALIEN, DISCLOSURE, SERPO, SEINU, PROJECT-CAMELOT - Open Minds Forum - WWW.OpenMindsForum.com :: General :: UFO/ Alien / Exobiology :: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
   [Search This Thread] [Send Topic To Friend] [Print]
 Author Topic: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed (Read 22,528 times)
Manteca
Full Member
***
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: May 2007
Posts: 51
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2280 on Yesterday at 11:51pm

In reponse to colorsymph's post.
Mind control huh....for a second I thought these could be running around doing mind control etc, sounds kinda Hollywood. Than something hit me...aren't these drones controlling our minds right now? The images themselves are. They are preoccupying our time, causing confusion and quite disrupting to a calm state of mind.
Last Edit: Yesterday at 11:54pm by Manteca Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
colorsymphony
Senior Member
****
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 123
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2281 on Yesterday at 11:54pm

i think thats his point.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
colorsymphony
Senior Member
****
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 123
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2282 on Today at 12:07am

so all of this mystery, mulitple witnesses, photos, confusion, distortion, no media attention, no government comment what-so-ever, the witnesses being vague in their responses, lack of cooperation from suposed reliable "sources", etc (the list could go on and on). everything is all too perfect and yet too strange. its fishy, just like many of us have been saying.

i'll leave it at that for now.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
regence
Full Member
***
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: May 2007
Posts: 46
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2283 on Today at 12:07am


Yesterday at 11:40pm, colorsymphony wrote:
i emailed patrick bellringer at http://www.fourwinds10.com/ multiple times in regards to these sightings.


Bellringer has been involved with the NESARA financial scam for years. I wouldn't trust him one iota. He's either a crook or deeply deluded.

http://www.quatloos.com/NESARA.htm names Bellringer as specifically involved with this scam. It blows my mind that they've been able to keep this Ponzi scheme going for so many years!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NESARA_conspiracy_theory is some good background.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/projects/dove/ gives an entire series on the crazy woman who started the scam.
Last Edit: Today at 12:24am by regence Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
10538
Forum Peer-Group Member
*****
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 260
Location: California
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2284 on Today at 12:24am


Yesterday at 11:40pm, colorsymphony wrote:
well, i don't know what to believe, still! its starting to annoy me how much i've been "distracted" by this. either way, i've asked a few people who seem to know what's going on. i emailed patrick bellringer at http://www.fourwinds10.com/ multiple times in regards to these sightings. his responses were always the same after each new set of photos. no matter how ET this big basin craft seems (with it disappearing and being able to fly with all that weight) he still thinks otherwise.

i asked him simple questions relating to the chad photos (which he posted shortly after it was reported on coasttocoast) in a calm manner and he replied with:  

"These UFO photos are of the U.S. Government drones used for such, as
mind-control and surveillance.  It makes for great gossip.  Other countries
have similar technology.

                           In Love and Light,
                           Patrick H. Bellringer"



If I were you I'd steer clear of this. Reading their website reminded me of the Heavens Gate cult, Jim Jones and the Branch Dividians all roled into one. The guy evidently has an agenda so he'll only continue to repeat the same party line.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
italiclikeitis
Full Member
***
member is offline





Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 39
Location: Ontario, Canada
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2285 on Today at 12:27am


Yesterday at 4:36pm, ninken wrote:
Just one question...How is the drone photographed in Big Basin supposed to land?

Stupid question? Maybe : (


That's a great question.

We may get lucky, and someone will decide to follow it around with a video camera.

I mean, I am not complaining. I am patient. I am convinced that the truth will be known eventually. But, I wonder why a video has not become available yet. I for one, would find a good video of the craft very compelling.

I have a question for all of you CGI, video and photo experts.
Is it easier to recognise CGI in a video or a still?

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
10538
Forum Peer-Group Member
*****
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 260
Location: California
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2286 on Today at 1:12am


Today at 12:27am, italiclikeitis wrote:

Yesterday at 4:36pm, ninken wrote:
Just one question...How is the drone photographed in Big Basin supposed to land?

Stupid question? Maybe : (


That's a great question.


This proves you new people are not reading back through the thread. I believe it was Midas who originally brought up the fact that these objects do not have landing gear. I expanded on it saying that this is proof that these objects are ET.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
enigma
New Member
*
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2287 on Today at 1:18am

No way can this thing "fly". Looks to me like a cross between a gas stove burner and an adjustable industrial textile bobbin thingy- made by "Raj Plastics" in India. (The company does exist.) :-)

Bet no one will ever find that Park ranger.

It's a hoax... clever... but still a hoax.

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
spf33
Medal of Initiative Award
*****
member is online





Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 186
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2288 on Today at 1:24am


Today at 12:27am, italiclikeitis wrote:

I have a question for all of you CGI, video and photo experts.
Is it easier to recognise CGI in a video or a still?


depends on who's doing the cg.

look at saladfingers video, that fooled a lot of people into thinking it was real.

i saw it and saw nothing other than camera tracking, a default grey texture with default lighting on a crappy model.
no offense there saladfinger.


but now the italian ufo video. i can't tell if it's real or not just by watching. sure there are hints as to real or cg, but nothing i'd ever stake my life on.

so you're question is kind of like "how long is a piece of string"?







Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
italiclikeitis
Full Member
***
member is offline





Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 39
Location: Ontario, Canada
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2289 on Today at 1:35am


Today at 1:12am, 10538 wrote:

Today at 12:27am, italiclikeitis wrote:


That's a great question.


This proves you new people are not reading back through the thread. I believe it was Midas who originally brought up the fact that these objects do not have landing gear. I expanded on it saying that this is proof that these objects are ET.


I can not prove that these aren't ET craft, but my gutt instincts suggest that these are man made. And I am a big fan of Sci-fi and The Xfiles. I think that match up was a great find. But it doesn't prove that any of the craft are Extra Terrestrial.

There just ins't enough evidence to make exraordinary claims like that.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
Dragonfire
UFO/EXOBIO MODERATOR
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

Deceptive Fence-sitter



Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,825
Location: Somewhere in time
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2290 on Today at 1:43am

There isn't enough evidence to prove anything yet. Other than we have some very clear pictures of .............What?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Irritating the world, one person at a time.
parralex
New Member
*
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2291 on Today at 1:49am

Didn't know if everyone had seen this or not.

http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=1265&category=Environment
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
italiclikeitis
Full Member
***
member is offline





Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 39
Location: Ontario, Canada
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2292 on Today at 1:54am


Today at 1:24am, spf33 wrote:

Today at 12:27am, italiclikeitis wrote:

I have a question for all of you CGI, video and photo experts.
Is it easier to recognise CGI in a video or a still?


depends on who's doing the cg.

look at saladfingers video, that fooled a lot of people into thinking it was real.

i saw it and saw nothing other than camera tracking, a default grey texture with default lighting on a crappy model.
no offense there saladfinger.


but now the italian ufo video. i can't tell if it's real or not just by watching. sure there are hints as to real or cg, but nothing i'd ever stake my life on.

so you're question is kind of like "how long is a piece of string"?









True Enough. Thanks for that. Sure, I saw the video when it came out. I know that it did fool some at first. But did it fool the CGI experts?

Great video BTW. I had never seen that one before.
Last Edit: Today at 1:56am by italiclikeitis Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
spf33
Medal of Initiative Award
*****
member is online





Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 186
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2293 on Today at 2:19am


Today at 1:54am, italiclikeitis wrote:
But did it fool the CGI experts?


i if i knew any experts that were fooled by salad's vid, i would smack them upside the head. but i don't, so i wont.

i really hope we get video of this cali object. certainly not impossible to continue the hoax with video, but it should be much easier to spot the fake. especially now with this object as many have become fairly accustom to seeing it in the photos, including the cg pro's.

for me the big basin photos are already putting me in a sort of uncanny valley for machines. animation usually amplifies the effect.


Last Edit: Today at 2:19am by spf33 Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
italiclikeitis
Full Member
***
member is offline





Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 39
Location: Ontario, Canada
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
Reply #2294 on Today at 2:31am

The problem with a lot of the hoaxes is that they look staged, or scripted. And that was the case with SaladFingers animation too. But in the scenereo, of that example, it was supposed to appear like maybe military guys were testing it out while recording it on video. That was pretty clever, on the part of SaladFingers, in that, this is pretty much exactly how a group of military guys would capture it on video. Kind of like as a presentation. I have seen some real videos like this of Candadian troops testing out new anti-tank missiles, and it was the same idea. Except, you could actually see some solders in it. And they were interacting with the stuff.
Last Edit: Today at 2:33am by italiclikeitis Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
   [Search This Thread] [Send Topic To Friend] [Print]

The Alien Seeker News

Click to discover what is: - 'Exempt From Disclosure'


Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free



This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Board!