Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and
detailed « Reply #1320 on
Today at 7:53am »
Thx for
replying and kinda helping me out
""I see what you are getting at here.
If Chad is not familiar with C2C why choose to post
there?"" Chad or raj im confusing the names sorry for
that.....but EXACTLY,i find the link to c2c very
odd.
Saladfinger(many thx for that) tried to find
c2c using "ufo" related stuff and he did find m using
the phrase "ufo image help"..BUT,funny thing is that u
get a link then to the RECENT ufo,the 1 u guys are
trying to debunk.With other words=that link dindt excist
when chad was looking.With other words=C2c wasnt even
mentioned by the searchengine!!!
Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and
detailed « Reply #1321 on
Today at 8:00am »
MidusTouch,
Do
you know Chinese? Mandarin or Cantonese? I see that you
are in Macau.
You stated that the symbols are a
mixture of Japanese, Arabic, Chinese and
Korean.
Where did you get this information? Is
this your own assessment, or based on other people's?
The reason I ask is because I have studied some Arabic
and I don't recall seeing any similarities to Arabic
characters.
As for Klingon, I don't know what you
mean by Klingon not being a proper language. It is still
a language even though artificial, and people *do* speak
it.
Both Chad's and
Raj's drones have different writings (or
symbols) all over the long and shorter
arms. The writings have a mixture of
Japanese, Arabic, Chinese and even
Korean
So
the aliens are Asian and Middle Eastern
polyglots?
Quote:
(forget Klingon
it isn't a proper
language).
Why
forget Klingon? It's more likely that the creator of
this craft knows Klingon than Japanese, Arabic, Chinese
and Korean.
Quote:
We'll never know
the meaning of these writings but one thing for
sure, they tell us that each arm has its
function different to the others. The amount of
writings (instructions) in each arm means that
the configurations is
endless.
You
seem pretty sure on the 'meaning' of the writing for
someone who thinks we can never know the meaning!
Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and
detailed « Reply #1323 on
Today at 8:17am »
Hi
guys,
I speak/read Chinese and japanese (i'm a
chinese from singapore) and do come in contact with some
occasional korean. From the idealized model of the
text figure on the craft provided by organelle. The
only character that come close to represent any chinese
character is the "+" which means "ten/10"(same meaning
when it's as a Kanji in japanese). The katakana
"fu"("hu") appear to look like フ (unicode U+30D5).
Nope... non of them look anything like
korean.
Do you know Chinese?
Mandarin or Cantonese? I see that you are in
Macau.
You stated that the symbols are a
mixture of Japanese, Arabic, Chinese and
Korean.
Where did you get this
information? Is this your own assessment, or
based on other people's? The reason I ask is
because I have studied some Arabic and I don't
recall seeing any similarities to Arabic
characters.
As for Klingon, I don't know
what you mean by Klingon not being a proper
language. It is still a language even though
artificial, and people *do* speak
it.
--Kana
Sorry!
I take back what I said about Klingon isn't a proper
language. Of course I read and speak Chinese and can
read quite a lot of Japanese. The Arabic number
writing is very similar to some of the characters shown
on the arm.
Both Chad's and
Raj's drones have different writings (or
symbols) all over the long and shorter
arms. The writings have a mixture of
Japanese, Arabic, Chinese and even
Korean
So
the aliens are Asian and Middle Eastern
polyglots?
Why forget Klingon?
It's more likely that the creator of this craft
knows Klingon than Japanese, Arabic, Chinese and
Korean.
Quote:
We'll never know
the meaning of these writings but one thing for
sure, they tell us that each arm has its
function different to the others. The amount of
writings (instructions) in each arm means that
the configurations is
endless.
You
seem pretty sure on the 'meaning' of the writing
for someone who thinks we can never know the
meaning!
Every
language in our world took hundreds if not thousands of
years to evolve. Languages from other galaxies and
planets are just the same, we need to understand their
history (lifestyles) to understand the essence of their
writings. For example, if we had 2 suns, Chinese
would used 2 circles (OO) to represent the suns &
daylight thousand years ago but not tits thou.
Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and
detailed « Reply #1326 on
Today at 10:07am »
MidusTouch
Is
my avatar affecting your thinking?
By the way it is waving hi to all the
new folk joining the forum. It is also doing a small jig
in celebration of witnesses to an event coming forward.
My jugs jig is much more fascinating than Shads
Snoopy!
"In die Beschraenkung zeigt sich erst Der Meister." --
Goethe (Mastery is shown by the ability to be
succinct). -- Garuda Last I checked, balls were meant
as counterweights to your brain. Are you balanced? --
Fore Sometimes in the greatest of men, the faults are
the greatest. --Fore
Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and
detailed « Reply #1327 on
Today at 11:17am »
I dont know
if anyone is compiling a list of questions to ask Raj
about this sighting, if so I would like to know what
time of day aprox the sighting was made?
By the way it is waving hi to
all the new folk joining the forum. It is also
doing a small jig in celebration of witnesses to
an event coming forward. My jugs jig is
much more fascinatino than Shads Snoopy!
Try not to wear it out with
your eyes .
your
'jugs jig' avatar is an insult to women- and to men.
Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and
detailed « Reply #1329 on
Today at 12:37pm »
A few more
things of note comparisons. Both Chad and Raj images
show that the object has 12 spikes spaced at 30 degrees
apart:
The spikes/fin moves with respect to
each other. as you can see by the different angles
between the spikes and long fin. I used a projected
center point and projected the spike wires to where I
though they would meet a plane on the long line:
This should indicate that the Chad and
Raj images are not simple CG copies of each other by
simply adding some extra components. It also seems to
indicate that the hub and other parts are not fixed
together.
Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and
detailed « Reply #1330 on
Today at 12:48pm »
It looks
like a cross between a bed warmer and an
oil-lantern---minus the glasswork.
Despite the
great detail of the pic, this object just doesn't make
any sense.
Let's be realistic. IF I'm an alien
from another galaxy, space travel would have to be
hingent on an extremely advanced form of travel...one
that would have to depend on the bending of space. We
are all intelligent enough on this subject.
Why
would you let yourself be seen, if you could do that?
Forget all the USG cover-up conspiracies.
And
where are all the other people that SHOULD have seen
this? Just plain old testimonials would suffice my
curiosity.
So I search for any evidence
today...and guess what? The Loch Ness monster is back.
Not one mention of these pics.
Until more than
two witnesses, who wish to remain anonymous, come
forward, I think this falls into the greyer areas.
Watching these forums for 'biscuits' of info is useless.
Not a single believer here doesn't think the USG has had
a hand in this in the past. If this IS the case, and
this WAS an alien aircraft, they couldn't supress the
eyewitnesses. But there are only...two???
Broad
daylight, AND, our witness states, besides him, 4 or 5
others, see this, and NO ONE else is coming forward.
Ask Raj why thats the case.
Life does
exist out there, somewhere, but so do a lot of
fakes.
Sorry if I offend....I'm sure I just did.
I actually hope I'm wrong.
I'll be away from the forum for the
next couple of days. Organelle, good job on the
characters. When I come back, and if someone
else has not already done so, I'll show some
comparisons with Japanese Katakana. Someone
asked how reliable my knowledge is -- I studied
Japanese for about a year and a half on the
college level. I can read things like children's
books, but would not be able to read for
example, a typical Japanese Newspaper. My
knowledge of Kanji characters is dearth. If you
don't trust my knowledge I can show the
characters to a native Japanese speaker friend
of mine. I would make sure to only show her the
characters and not the craft.
Also,
since I live in Santa Cruz, I am going to make
an effort to talk to the Santa Cruz Sentinel.
Everyone else is also welcome to give
them an email. Maybe if they got enough people
bugging them they will give an
answer.
--Kana
Kana,
That
would be just fantastic if you could stop by the
Sentinel's offices. Take along some copies of the photos
if you are able to print them out.
A few more things of
note comparisons. Both Chad and Raj images
show that the object has 12 spikes spaced at 30
degrees apart:
The spikes/fin moves with
respect to each other. as you can see by the
different angles between the spikes and long
fin. I used a projected center point and
projected the spike wires to where I though they
would meet a plane on the long line:
This should indicate that the
Chad and Raj images are not simple CG copies of
each other by simply adding some extra
components. It also seems to indicate that the
hub and other parts are not fixed
together.
1)
Does this mean that the object spins?
2) Is there
a way to figure out if it is horizontal at all, relative
to the ground?
3) By the way, in one of the
photo's where you bring out the background. Is the
bottom and inner ring covered in some kind of symbols?
"In die Beschraenkung zeigt sich erst Der Meister." --
Goethe (Mastery is shown by the ability to be
succinct). -- Garuda Last I checked, balls were meant
as counterweights to your brain. Are you balanced? --
Fore Sometimes in the greatest of men, the faults are
the greatest. --Fore
Joined: Mar 2006 Gender:
Male Posts: 2,709 Location: Ohio
Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and
detailed « Reply #1333 on
Today at 12:59pm »
Hey fence,
spf33 and any other analytical minds out
there,
Can you apply some of the same techniques
to stills taken from saladfinger's cgi demo video? My
thought is that doing so would help to prove that there
is a substantial difference between the object(s) in the
photos and a known cg object. Especially given the
apparent motion you are seeing in the analysis of the
photos.
Salad - is motion of the various parts
something you can create in cg?
Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and
detailed « Reply #1334 on
Today at 1:02pm »
My thoughts
on how a water bug moves (after watching that waterbug
video posted earlier):
I think it breaks the
coefficient of friction and slides over the water in
quick jerky movements. There may be some bounce back
from retracting the legs. Here's my graph of movement
over time. You can try this experiment yourself on a
chair with wheels (not on a rug) or any chair that
easily moves on the floor while you sit on it. While
sitting, jerk your body forward and the chair will move
in one direction, if you slowly move your body back --
the chair will not move backwards. You can move right
across the room without ever touching the ground with
your feet.
I've always imagined that an aircraft
of some sort could be built to harness this jerking
motion to get off the ground. Since air has friction --
a movement similar and fast enough might overcome the
air friction periodically to cause a movement in one
direction.
![[Search This Thread]](http://s3.images.proboards.com/search2.gif)
![[Send Topic To Friend]](http://s3.images.proboards.com/buttons/sendtopic.gif)
![[Print]](http://s3.images.proboards.com/buttons/print.gif)
Author
Logged![[avatar]](http://dianahay.org/images/menger_icon.jpg){kind=icon}
![[avatar]](http://s3.images.proboards.com/avatars/devil.gif)
![[avatar]](http://s3.images.proboards.com/avatars/smiley.gif)
![[msn]](http://s3.images.proboards.com/msn.gif)
![[image]](http://www.omniglot.com/images/writing/arabic_num.gif)
![[avatar]](http://i19.tinypic.com/4ttg2df.gif)
![[avatar]](http://paranormalfiles.freeforums.org/files/paranormalfiles/avatars/736671457460543d933187.jpg)
![[homepage]](http://s3.images.proboards.com/buttons/www_sm.gif)
![[image]](http://mysite.orange.co.uk/paranormal-files/images/Pphotography.gif)
![[avatar]](http://img279.imageshack.us/img279/8450/16127it0.jpg)
![[avatar]](http://i12.tinypic.com/66y9do2.jpg)
![[image]](http://i11.tinypic.com/4m2wyer.jpg)
![[image]](http://i14.tinypic.com/5yrka2p.jpg)
![[avatar]](http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n239/ivo5000/Old20ufo1.jpg)
![[image]](http://i17.tinypic.com/4po7060.jpg)