Dan Smith - May 5th - Part One Dan Smith-May5-07-...
Dan Smith - May 5th - Part Two
Dan Smith-May5-07-...



UFO, ALIEN, DISCLOSURE, SERPO, SEINU, PROJECT-CAMELOT - Open Minds Forum - http://www.openmindsforum.com/
« UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jun 2, 2007, 12:05am





UFO, ALIEN, DISCLOSURE, SERPO, SEINU, PROJECT-CAMELOT - Open Minds Forum - WWW.OpenMindsForum.com :: General :: UFO/ Alien / Exobiology :: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« »    [Search This Thread] [Send Topic To Friend] [Print]
 Author Topic: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed (Read 51,093 times)
jeddyhi
Co-Administrator
*****
Serpo Forum Co-Founder
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,275
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1410 on Yesterday at 10:12pm »


Yesterday at 9:33pm, TheShadow wrote:
In the lack of anything new here and in the interest of verification i decided to email Peter Davenport of http://www.nuforc.org/

What follows is my email to nuforc:

Hello Peter,
I have been following along with the recent rash of (supposed) sightings from Capitola, CA along with the Chad photos, I am sure you are aware of the latest hoopla.

I was wondering if nuforc.org has received any additional sightings of these events? If so would it be alright if i post them (or any other response you have) to the openminds forum http://lucianarchy.proboards21.com/
Look forward to your reply
XXXX XXXXXX


I will post any response i receive


Excellent! Way to get active and look for answers. When enough people start looking for the truth, they eventually find it!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

[image]
spf33
Full Member
***
member is offline





Joined: May 2007
Posts: 92
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1411 on Yesterday at 10:14pm »


Yesterday at 10:06pm, TheShadow wrote:
You forgot my favorite:

Anal probe


it's doesn't surprise me that you favor a good anal probe.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
TheShadow
Goldstar Contributer Award
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

"The Shadow Knows!"



Joined: Mar 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,025
Location: USA
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1412 on Yesterday at 10:15pm »

Well us agents of deception know a good time when we see (or is that feel?) one!
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
spf33
Full Member
***
member is offline





Joined: May 2007
Posts: 92
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1413 on Yesterday at 10:18pm »

...only the shadow knows.

did anyone get the impression that raj meant to stop in here only one time to answer questions?
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:19pm by spf33 » Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
italiclikeitis
Junior Member
**
member is offline





Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12
Location: Ontario, Canada
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1414 on Yesterday at 10:21pm »

Yep, that's smart. He hasn't updated the site in a while. In fact, last time I was at the site(http://www.nuforc.org/), they weren't up to May 2007 yet. They probably are just busy.

It would be brilliant, if he was to appear on Coast to Coast AM soon, or maybe come in here. I am new here, so.. Does he ever come in here?

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
TheShadow
Goldstar Contributer Award
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

"The Shadow Knows!"



Joined: Mar 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,025
Location: USA
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1415 on Yesterday at 10:23pm »

The reports at nuforc.org are recent as of 4/27 only. That is why i figured i would drop him an email and see if maybe we get a response.

Mr. Davenport has never stopped in here that i am aware of....maybe the link will lure him this way!
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:24pm by TheShadow » Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
astrodicted
New Member
*
member is offline





Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1416 on Yesterday at 10:26pm »

Last time
Chad said that he discovered c2c because he was lookin for info on the internet.
Did he type "podcast" then in the searchengine?Maybe Art Bell,George Noory?(persons he couldnt know if he didnt know bout c2c)

BECAUSE ITS NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO GET A LINK TO C2C IF WORDS LIKE "UFO" ARE USED IN SEARCHENGINE(sorry for caps,but im trying to point something out)
1 Link to c2c so far and its bout this ufo

How big is the chance that some1 who sees his first ufo,will post the pics on a allmost impossible to find ;pay to listen podcast site???

I wanna believe so bad,but this "doomthinking" keeps chasing me ;)

Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
ivo5000
Co-Administrator
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

Disclosure is inevitable



Joined: Mar 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,713
Location: Ohio
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1417 on Yesterday at 10:37pm »


Yesterday at 8:47pm, colorsymphony wrote:

if its military, then it makes sense for them to put strange writing on it. to hide who it belongs to seems like an obvious action for someone owning this thing. to purposely make it seem like a possible alien craft, which they have done with the writing and overall design and technology involving why it flys, in my honest opinion, is a whole other agenda on their behalf. the writing and "silence" from the gov and media says a lot.

it being an honest "nothing to see here folks" kinda thing like something to simply monitor energy or anything similar and unharmful, seems highly out of the question. why the silence then? look at this thing! the mystery (origin) and technology involved here screams; if it's government(military), and they aren't talking, then we know why. if its an ET craft and no ones talking - we know why.
i think its safe assuming the gov knows about these pictures.

The biggest problem with people thinking that this is military is that it is being seen over populated areas. Test craft or vehicles DO NOT make test runs over the general population. They are confined to the test areas designed for the purpose.

The government knows about these pictures for no other reason than the fact that they monitor us. This I know for sure. ;)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

"True courage is not the brutal force of vulgar heroes, but the firm resolve of virtue and reason." —Alfred North Whitehead
organelle
Junior Member
**
member is online

[avatar]


[homepage]

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1418 on Yesterday at 10:41pm »

A couple of notes:

1. If the craft is human-engineered, putting it out where anyone can (and probably will) take pot-shots at it, and disguising it in nonsense-writing doesn't make sense to me. Anyone who can photograph this thing in this way can certainly pump lead into it, and many probably would. Additionally, putting long paragraphs of nonsense writing on the small arms makes pretty much zero sense (to humans, in general). In fact, putting nonsense writing on it -vastly increases- the chances of it being shot at, or shot down.

Ergo: Chances it's a military project are exceedingly slim. Similar problem with 'private inventor' hypothesis.

2. If the craft were military, we'd probably see either recognizable equipment or at -least- mount-points for recognizable equipment. Mount points or equipment? None that I can see.

3. -If- the thing was actually flying in the atmosphere, it's either human engineered, or not. In this case the vast preponderance of evidence would point to: not.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:42pm by organelle » Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

New Ways of Knowing: http://www.organelle.org/
spf33
Full Member
***
member is offline





Joined: May 2007
Posts: 92
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1419 on Yesterday at 10:42pm »


Quote:

The government knows about these pictures for no other reason than the fact that they monitor us. This I know for sure. ;)


been getting many .mil or .gov hits since the beginning of the whole story? for that matter, what about aerospace companies?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
admin
Co-Administrator
*****
Open Minds Forum Founder
member is offline

[avatar]

"It's been a long, strange trip..."



Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,763
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1420 on Yesterday at 10:51pm »


Yesterday at 10:37pm, ivo5000 wrote:


The biggest problem with people thinking that this is military is that it is being seen over populated areas. Test craft or vehicles DO NOT make test runs over the general population. They are confined to the test areas designed for the purpose.


Yes, I agree and I don't think the military would lose control of such a thing either. Like I said, I think this 'thing' was *definitely* MEANT to be photographed and the writing noticed. So my other hypothesis will have to be, if these things are material / terrestrial: those craft were maybe out as part of the other 'disclosure envelope pushing' events going on around the world right now 8-) , ...or not! ;D

but let's see the full picture first!
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 11:08pm by admin » Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

Imagine: http://disclosure-ufo.blogspot.com/
ivo5000
Co-Administrator
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

Disclosure is inevitable



Joined: Mar 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,713
Location: Ohio
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1421 on Yesterday at 10:55pm »


Yesterday at 10:42pm, spf33 wrote:

Quote:

The government knows about these pictures for no other reason than the fact that they monitor us. This I know for sure. ;)


been getting many .mil or .gov hits since the beginning of the whole story? for that matter, what about aerospace companies?

I know people. ;)
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

"True courage is not the brutal force of vulgar heroes, but the firm resolve of virtue and reason." —Alfred North Whitehead
TheShadow
Goldstar Contributer Award
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

"The Shadow Knows!"



Joined: Mar 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,025
Location: USA
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1422 on Yesterday at 10:57pm »


Yesterday at 10:55pm, ivo5000 wrote:

I know people. ;)


Okay Ivo Ill bite.....what are these "people" saying about this particular event?
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
colorsymphony
Full Member
***
member is offline

[avatar]



Joined: May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 63
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1423 on Yesterday at 10:58pm »


Yesterday at 10:37pm, ivo5000 wrote:
The biggest problem with people thinking that this is military is that it is being seen over populated areas. Test craft or vehicles DO NOT make test runs over the general population. They are confined to the test areas designed for the purpose.



Yesterday at 10:41pm, organelle wrote:
A couple of notes:

1. If the craft is human-engineered, putting it out where anyone can (and probably will) take pot-shots at it, and disguising it in nonsense-writing doesn't make sense to me. Anyone who can photograph this thing in this way can certainly pump lead into it, and many probably would. Additionally, putting long paragraphs of nonsense writing on the small arms makes pretty much zero sense (to humans, in general). In fact, putting nonsense writing on it -vastly increases- the chances of it being shot at, or shot down.

Ergo: Chances it's a military project are exceedingly slim. Similar problem with 'private inventor' hypothesis.

2. If the craft were military, we'd probably see either recognizable equipment or at -least- mount-points for recognizable equipment. Mount points or equipment? None that I can see.

3. -If- the thing was actually flying in the atmosphere, it's either human engineered, or not. In this case the vast preponderance of evidence would point to: not.


i understand all of these points. IF its militiary it just doesn't make sense for them to be flying these things around in the open, it almost seems like an accident, like it wasn't supposed to happen - that is why i said its possible the ETs actually sent these gov crafts out, from where ever or what ever base they are loacted at, to make something the gov has planned (the other agenda i mentioned) blow up in their own face. the ET's using the gov's own evil plan against them to make disclosure happen soon. this could be the kick off.
something fishy is going on, and i know some of you can smell it.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 11:16pm by colorsymphony » Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
ivo5000
Co-Administrator
*****
member is offline

[avatar]

Disclosure is inevitable



Joined: Mar 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,713
Location: Ohio
 Re: UFO -'best yet'? up close and detailed
« Reply #1424 on Yesterday at 11:05pm »


Yesterday at 10:57pm, TheShadow wrote:

Yesterday at 10:55pm, ivo5000 wrote:

I know people. ;)


Okay Ivo Ill bite.....what are these "people" saying about this particular event?

Ain't nobody sayin' nothin' at this point. But I do know that we are monitored by several people on a regular basis, and these people work for various alphabet agencies and doing so is considered to be a part of their job.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

"True courage is not the brutal force of vulgar heroes, but the firm resolve of virtue and reason." —Alfred North Whitehead
« »    [Search This Thread] [Send Topic To Friend] [Print]

The Alien Seeker News

Click to discover what is: - 'Exempt From Disclosure'


Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free



This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Board!